Miki Jankovic vs Joss Espasandin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W L L W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Jankovic 1 - 0 Espasandin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jankovic winning 2 and Espasandin winning 0. The last match between Jankovic and Espasandin was at the Serbia F4, 08-07-2013, Second, Clay with Miki Jankovic getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miki Jankovic | 1 |
| Joss Espasandin | 0 |
Serbia F4(08-07-2013)
6
3
7
5
| Jankovic | Stats | Espasandin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 256 | Highest Rank | 665 |
| 30 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (237-145) | Career Total W/L | 37% (51-86) |
| $730 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jankovic VS Espasandin H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
Jankovic VS Espasandin H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miki Jankovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Alessandro Bega
Player
Miki Jankovic
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miki Jankovic
Player
Sergio Martos Gornes
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarp Agabigun
Player
Miki Jankovic
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miki Jankovic
Player
Franco Feitt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jules Okala
Player
Miki Jankovic
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miki Jankovic
Player
Sumit Nagal
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miki Jankovic
Player
Ioannis Stergiou
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Brechemier
Player
Miki Jankovic
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miki Jankovic
Player
Rasul Gojayev
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Miki Jankovic
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
114)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
50 of
77)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Joss Espasandin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 1-6 7-6(10) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (237/145) | Win/Loss | 37% (51/86) |
| 60% (513/344) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (125/182) |
| 54% (4338/3665) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (1316/1498) |
| 62% (63/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 23% (3/10) |
| 63% (162/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (44/67) |
| 48% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 564 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 179 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 581.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.56 |
| 62% (5031/8111) | 1st Serve % | 59% (86/147) |
| 72% (3604/5031) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (57/86) |
| 51% (1581/3080) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (36/61) |
| 44% (358/811) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 40% (3289/8250) | Return Points Win % | 36% (60/165) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (30/29) | Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 65% (206/111) | Futures W/L | 38% (49/79) |
| 63% (230/368) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (49/134) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (66/120) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (12/35) |
| 58% (57/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 28% (9/32) |
| 89% (228/204) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (54/44) |
| 9% (228/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (54/10) |
| 21% (153/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (83/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
